reddragdiva: (gosh!, news, nice cup of tea and a sit down)Red Drag Diva ([personal profile] reddragdiva) wrote,
3 and 4 are not dependent on 1 and 2 - the six statements are related in pairs, but are separate statements, not a logical chain. Read again and see if it makes more sense.

I'm speaking loosely and using "dualism" to mean "not physicalism". I don't feel the ambiguity makes much practical difference.


(Read 22 comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
Anonymous (will be screened)
OpenID (will be screened if not on Access List)
Identity URL: 
User (will be screened if not on Access List)
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.