Dancing in the sheets.
Aug. 22nd, 2010 06:17 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Wikimedia blog: We will add your activist distinctness to our own.
Having failed to find any of the several phones-and-chargers I know are kicking around here, I have bought something cheap and horrible (cheap and cheerful, really) for ten quid. It makes calls and has an FM radio which Freda promptly danced around to and I expect the K750i will show up tomorrow.
Domesticity is becoming rather busy; unlikely to be leaving the house much at all in the next month or two, barring work (at which I am doing my boss's job as well as my own for the next fortnight). I remain somewhat contactable online.
I have been on an alt-med binge, having read literally every page of Wiki4CAM. In the last coupla days we have Oprah Winfrey, Acupressure, Bach flower remedies, Craniosacral therapy, Pranic healing, ThetaHealing™, Traditional Chinese Medicine and Isopathy. And mind uploading.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-22 06:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-22 06:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-22 07:32 pm (UTC)And. Chelation Therapy? I mean, what? How long have they been administering British Anti-Lewisite down the Holistic Drop-in Centre?
Jayzus.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-22 08:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-22 07:54 pm (UTC)Cheap & cheerful, it is light, has good battery, OK sound quality, and fairly easy to use (though mass-delete of SMS would be good).
No easy phonebook sync but I can bluetooth contacts across from my PC.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-22 08:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 12:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 07:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 08:40 am (UTC)Whereas something like chelation therapy seems as though it could potentially be extremely harmful. For all we know, it's harming people right now, and we'll discover how in a few years - like with sunbed tanning.
I kind of feel there should be a sub-division of the efficacy category into "possible benefits" (which for eg reflexology might be 'diminishing foot pain' or 'stress reduction' or something like that, but would still say 'no evidence that it magically helps with stomach problems') and possible harm, which means all the gentle touching or not-quite-touching therapies would generally fall into "mostly harmless', while chelation would be "whoa, danger time!"
Does that make sense? I do feel there's an important distinction between woo which doesn't do what it says on the tin, but doesn't really do any harm (unless people decide to forego conventional medicine and rely on it) and might have some beneficial side-effects, and between woo which can be actively harmful.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 09:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 10:14 am (UTC)IA, but I think these are different kinds of harm. Things which are directly harmful in their own right need bigger warnings in brighter red letters, IYSWIM.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-08-23 10:20 am (UTC)