reddragdiva: (Default)
[personal profile] reddragdiva

I have just spent three hours carefully reinstalling the laptop with FreeBSD 4.9. Restart for its first boot ... and it won't. It sits there at

F1  DOS
F2  FreeBSD

Default: F2 _

and seems to consider the keyboard beneath its notice. Odd, since the caps lock light goes on and off as expected. But nothing will get it off this screen.

(The DOS partition is a 20 meg partition for IBM system tools, as yet not installed.)

Please tell me what to do to get this to work without spending a few more hours installing. (With as much detail, or pointers to such, as you can manage.) Else it's BIG HAMMER TIME. Nearly.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-16 04:41 pm (UTC)
vampwillow: geekgrrl (geekgrrl)
From: [personal profile] vampwillow
I'm wondering whether you write the right boot block during the partition setup? did you set the partition as bootable (yes, I'm aware I might be teaching you how to suck eggs but I might as well list thoughts).

IME 4.9 installs and runs without a problem (which can't quite be said for 5.2.1). You could try posting in the [livejournal.com profile] freebsd community maybe?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-16 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kraant.livejournal.com
Can you use a boot floppy to boot the freebsd partition?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-16 05:09 pm (UTC)
vampwillow: (Default)
From: [personal profile] vampwillow
ooops ... sorry ... [livejournal.com profile] freebsd_users

you could try installing a basic DOS on the F1 (although is it needed at all, ie could you use a floppy-DOS for the purpose when needed and use FreeBSD for the rest (have never found the need to retain a dos partition myself on any linux/bsd box

Hrmm.

Date: 2004-03-16 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
So pressing F2 has zero effect? I'm trying to remember what the choices are for boot loader during install, but I think if I was in your situation I'd boot the install cd and try to get a shell and just poke around for the boot loader settings. I've never bothered with fbsd's bootloader, so I don't have any experience with it, but it's more than likely you did something wrong. I wonder if it just can't get past the DOS partition not having anything installed on it? Maybe it needs the DOS install there first or setup gets confused and pooches the boot config.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-16 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] poggs.livejournal.com
Random, but is it trying to accept input from the serial port maybe? Or does the laptop have a really nonstandard keyboard that doesn't work with normal things?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 01:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] death4breakfast.livejournal.com
Just throwing ideas here, but sometimes something simple and stupid can work. Have you tried plugging in (If you can.) an external keyboard and seeing if it accepts input from that?

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 03:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
Are you sure the BIOS and OS disc geometry agree?
Also, I think the FreeBSD boot blocks -may- have some problems dealing with an XT keyboard; does this laptop emulate an AT keyboard or does it actually behave as if it has an XT keyboard to the OS? If it has an XT keyboard, try the external keyboard route already suggested.
You can also try to boot from floppy, then use the boot loader that is loaded from the floppy to boot the hard disc - if this works your disc boot blocks or the data they work from (disc geometry, etc) is fux0red.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 05:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
Yes.
Dig around www.freebsd.org to find out about the new Forth-based loader, etc.
I would try booting from a floppy and trying to use that boot loader (5.2.1 or 4.9) to run the OS from disc first of all.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 06:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
Well dammit then use 5.2.1! Don't make me come over there. Mumble grumble grunt stumble grunt want caffeine

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
For those of you not paying attention to the back, 5.2.1 (5.anything actually) has shit sound support on laptops, and this laptop wasn't making as much noise as the primary user desired.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 07:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] loosechanj.livejournal.com
I cannot be held responsible for comments posted before morning caffeine has set my mind in motion.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owdbetts.livejournal.com
But I thought 4.x just had shit support for laptops in general? Or am I mistaken?

-roy

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-17 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arkady.livejournal.com
Use of <blink> tags is BAD and WRONG.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-18 09:03 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2004-03-18 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
This is about the one circumstance where I'd tolerate it; you're providing a sample of some computer-generated output some of which is actually blinking.