This is distinctly unpleasant news for anyone for whom the juicy bits of their CV consist of Solaris admin experience. I won't be acting this apocalyptically urgently, but fear this assessment's likelihood. I see leegnux in my professional future.
The weekend has otherwise been quite nice, thank you. We are making a
vague start to cleaning the house before going on holiday, in between
recovering from illness and failing to catch up on sleep. I took the rats
over to
arkady's and spent some quality time before three
weeks' absence. She had an early shift this morning, so we woke up at
5:15am thinking, "It's still Saturday night. People are still at
Slimelight." I think I shall be going back to bed now.
I am off w*rk for three weeks. I am presently in Recovery.
redcountess has a laptop! And Internet in bed! With all the candy! We've just bought a battery for it as well, to be picked up in Australia.
Update: Sun's future business model.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 07:10 am (UTC)But, uh, none of those things are true.
Sun hasn't been able to turn a profit in about 9 months, but they're a very long way from dying in a sense where you and I wouldn't see Solaris on the job any more.
I find it marginally revolting that Linux (and, not just that, Red Hat) is "where we're going". Sheesh; why couldn't somebody get off their ass and market FreeBSD decently?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 07:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 07:19 am (UTC)(Btw, what's the IT job market in the UK like these days? Just wondering...)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 07:24 am (UTC)The keys are like right next to each other.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 11:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 03:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 04:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 08:05 pm (UTC)I honestly don't think the cessation of hostilities is a big deal. If anything is going to kill Sun it's the lack of profit and the slashing of the R&D budget, not agreeing to call off the lawyers.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-04 08:13 pm (UTC)I have come to the conclusion that Linux -- even Red Hat -- isn't especially evil. The real problem is the hardware: people (read "management") see Linux as being cheap, and thus buy cheap boxes to run it on, and cheap PCs don't have serial consoles.
At least with Solaris on *SPARC kit they don't get the chance to cut the price of the box by opting-out on the serial console or the LOM.
(This is not a big deal to your average ex-Windows admin type, because they're not used to being able to do just about everything short of swapping parts out from the comfort of their office. It's a bloody big deal to me, particularly given that the machines are usually off in some other part of the city or on a different continent.)
There are problems with every Linux distro (and, quite frankly, with FreeBSD, particularly if you run it in a highish kernel security level), but most of those can be ironed out. Cheap-arse machines, however, are much trickier to deal with.
Still, where I work (and will hopefully continue working until I retire in thirty years) this sort of consideration is quite a high priority, so we won't be touching Linux any time soon, and if we do at some point find ourselves forced to go there, it'll be on boxes with serial consoles and other nice things.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-05 05:51 am (UTC)I think puts it more accurately. My biggest problem with Linux is Linux users and all the shite bloody code they put out which claims to run on "unix" when in fact they mean what ever particular distro they happen to be running. Oh and whose documentation for install consists of a standard bolier plate which lists options which may sometimes work.
Ahem.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-05 05:53 am (UTC)That said we seem to be doing red hat stuff here, but skillfully avoiding any cost savings by buying inappropriate over specced boxes.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-04-05 11:23 am (UTC)