Stallman and Raymond were right: pseudo-free software and pseudo-open source mean proprietary and closed. Sun Microsystems has unilaterally revoked the FreeBSD project's Java license (under the pseudo-open Sun Community Source License), apparently as part of renegotiating all SCSL arrangements. Despite much effort from FreeBSD, it seems Sun can't be bothered arranging another one. See also coverage on JavaLobby and Café au Lait. "Write once, run on any platform Sun likes this week." Is this how they plan to "open source" Solaris?
Edit: The source option remains available, although it requires three separate downloads and installing Linux compatibility and Java for Linux. Because proprietary software is not just evil, it's stupid. (That post being the first statement of Diva's Second Law of Software.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 09:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 09:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 10:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 11:42 pm (UTC)Mind you, I've heard it is possible, but I was hampered by the fact I was using a custom version of ports (don't ask) and it emerged a week later when the machine failed to boot that my hard drive controller was ailing...
No I don't know why you need java for open office but apparently you do. The install procedure was somewhat baroque to say the least.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-05 11:52 pm (UTC)It's weird. Sun have produced a license that looks like it's free by pretty much anyone's standards, and they're hinting that Solaris will be under it. But Java (you know, that piece of software that they give away to people and which doesn't tend to encourage people to buy Sun hardware) remains under a license that's worse than paedophiles. And world hunger. Together.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-06 12:26 am (UTC)No-one who wants to run OOo on FreeBSD and retain their sanity does anything other than use the binary packages. For a while on FreeBSD 4.6.2 I was using the Linux binary under emulation. I must say the Linux compatibility layer does do pretty much all one would want.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-06 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-06 12:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-01-06 12:32 am (UTC)