![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
reddragdiva) wrote2010-01-02 09:51 pm
Goodbye today.com, you are too stupid to live.
You will not MAKE MONEY FAST from blogging. No, you will not. I strongly suggest the time-honoured MAKE MONEY SLOW scheme where you show up to a place of business and do something of economic value for fortyish hours a week.
notnews.today.com started because a friend of arkady's, who was working for today.com for a while and now isn't (he is far, far too nice and too classy to bitch; I am neither), pointed out I could get $1/post plus $2/1000 clicks for blogging. Hey, who knows! So of course I started writing fake news, having done a lot at Uncyclopedia UnNews.
This was fine for a while. It kept my brain working and my creative juices ticking — that's the main good effect on me. I got enough cash to pay for groceries once a month, and there was a reasonable community of entertaining writers on the forum. (I suspect it was me that lured Hindleyite over.)
Then today.com cut the per-click, to much protest. Then they emailed me in early December that NotN wasn't getting enough clicks (at about 1000 UV/day) to rate a whole $1 per post. I went to the forum to see if anyone was still getting it, and gosh, the forum was shut down for maintenance. Still is, strangely enough.
Considering the best feedback I get on my fake news endeavours is from my friends, I decided that £15/month was really not enough to inflict FLOATING FLASHING POPUP ADS on you lovely people. Also, I make approximately two hundred and forty times this from the good old-fashioned Make Money Slow plan.
I gave up writing anything for these idiots and started thinking up domain names, since all obvious variants on "News of the News" had been taken. Eventually I was drunk down the pub with ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
nyecamden, genetikayos and a netbook and bought newstechnica.com (and .co.uk and .org.uk). And I've been writing more stuff, on a site that looks 1000% better, with COMPLETE CONTROL. And all my old stuff imported from the other site. Hooray!
Today at 17:15, I received this:
Subject: Today.com - Sharing Revenue in 2010 Welcome to the Today of the Future As we move into the New Year we've revised the Today.com compensation plan to include Google AdSense. Today.com will split all Google AdSense earnings on each blog 50/50 with its VIP bloggers. In addition we will donate 5% of our share to a charity to help Americans in today's economy. Simply log into your Today.com account, and submit your Google Adsense Publisher Id and you're ready to go! For more information on setting up your account, please reference the Today.com wiki at: http://today.com/wiki/index.php/Google_AdSense To coincide with the Google AdSense Revshare launch, our latest revshare enhancement, Today.com will be removing PPM compensation from the program. Earnings already accumulated will not be affected by this change. It is important to note that this does not take away from your ability to earn money with Today.com. Today.com already has established affiliate and revshare programs in place to add to your earnings. Advertising Revshare Program http://today.com/wiki/index.php/Advertising_Revshare Affiliate Referral Program http://today.com/wiki/index.php/Affiliate Product Affiliate Program http://today.com/wiki/index.php/Product_Affiliate_Program In addition to revshare considerations we've implemented new Content and Site Management Guidelines. Many are the same guidelines that were already in place; however experience has made it necessary to require bloggers to take SEO into consideration when drafting their posts and to make modifications to their sites according to the new rules. In particular we are banning widgets altogether unless they are Today.com affiliate/referral widgets or WordPress widgets related to navigating your site. In addition we are outlining rules for the About page. All pages on any site must follow the rules that apply to posts. Pages with any personal, referral, affiliate, or advertising links not specific to any Today.com affiliate program will be removed. no per For more information on the new rules and a refresher on the rules that have always been in place visit: http://today.com/wiki/index.php/Content_and_Site_Management_Guidelines For bloggers looking to propose a new blog in another topic area (new topics added), we invite you to apply at: http://www.today.com/register-new Today.com wishes you a Happy and Prosperous New Year. Sincerely, The Today.com Team
The takehome from this is: no per-post, now no per-click, but you do get 50% of the Google ad revenue! Rather than the 100% you'd get writing on, e.g., Blogspot or your own installation of WordPress.
I went to the site and, in a major whiny little bitch dummy-spit, removed all my images, removed all the text I could and set the theme to white-on-white everything. It was like that for about an hour, then they restored what they could with a generic theme and my login no longer works.
Update: Bitch-a-rama!
It was fine while it was fine, then it wasn't and it wasn't. So, NewsTechnica for the win! If you're on DreamWidth, the syndicated feed is ![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png){kind=small}
newstechnica_feed. If you're on LiveJournal, the syndicated feed is ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-syndicated.gif){kind=small}
newstechnica. So you don't have to wait for me to bother posting something to see when there's a new story.
NewsTechnica is currently running about 200-300 UVs (unique views) a day, rather than the 1000 or so the old site was. I expect this will pick up with time. TELL YOUR FRIENDS.
?
Re: ?
Re: ?
Re: ?
Re: ?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Broadcast TV in the US is suffering serious reductions in what advertisers are willing to pay, prompting various showdowns with cable companies as broadcasters try to get a cut of the cable bill (a funding model that I think makes much more sense).
Of course, given how these things go, the chances that we'll all have to pay for the ability to view content riddled with ads is high. Capitalism: we specialize in bringing you the worst of all possible worlds, simultaneously.
no subject
I've got NewsTechnica on a mates' rates (£0) box, with mates' rates reliability, and WP Super-Cache in front of my installation. Cross fingers.
no subject
This is Hindleyite, OpenID is bein a beeyatch
(Anonymous) 2010-01-04 11:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2010-01-18 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)- Kelly
The Convention Fans Blog
http://conventionfansblog.com
no subject
Uh-huh. Yeah. Right. That doesn't sound suspiciously vague, or anything.
This is my cynical face: :-|
no subject
The guy who lured me in was writing six blogs for them and then was working for them. He escaped pretty unscathed and un-screwed over, thankfully.
no subject
*Adds feed*
no subject
no subject
No. The goal of the honest blogger is to write posts that will get other people to link to them. That's the win. That's providing content that goes viral. See my "top posts of 2009 list" (left sidebar of newstechnica.com front page) for winners. Prizewinner: the Windows 7 Drinking Game. Write things that have "meme" all over them.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
NewsTechnica couldn't ask for better stablemates.
no subject
no subject
By the way, lemonparty.org gets about 25,000 hits a day. INTERNET TRIVIA! TELL YOUR FRIENDS!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
That'd be copyright infringement, no? Try sending a DMCA takedown notice to their upstream.
no subject