reddragdiva: (Default)
[personal profile] reddragdiva

I want a PC to use as my household server, both internally and externally. I want something that is low-powered, preferably to the point it doesn't need a fan and hence runs silent, to be on 24 hours a day. I'm thinking one of them tiny boxes with a Via chip in it. I figure it'll pay for itself in saved power in a reasonably short time. I'll probably run FreeBSD or OpenBSD on it. Does anyone have experience and/or recommendations?

(I could easily use the G4 for the job, but it does make noise. The current internal household server, my Compaq FreeBSD desktop, is sturdy and stable enough to be a server and remarkably quiet, but just a bit thirsty.)

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 02:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellsop.livejournal.com
Lots of people manage it. Here's a page I've looked at before: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/via_openbsd.html

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
533Mhz-VIA motherboards in itx format are rilly cheep and need no fan.
Eg http://linitx.com/product_info.php?cPath=12_45&products_id=1
Also very shiny cases are available from many suppliers, and shiny is important.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secretlondon.livejournal.com
If you can get a linux for ARM you could be able to make something very power saving indeed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-tom.livejournal.com
I'm using an old Dell laptop that's got a dead battery and therefore no use as a laptop. It's pretty quiet. Certainly, the external disk makes more noise than the machine...

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xthlcm.livejournal.com
Hmm, is your G4 a mini? Some people complain about the fan noise, but in my experience they're pretty quiet. I've been embedding them in some of the smart furniture I've been building for Steelcase, and they seem to work well. The mini Core Duos might be quieter, but they draw a bit more power (110 vs 85 watts).

My adventures in Mini-ITX

Date: 2006-03-12 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kineticfactory.livejournal.com
I built such a box last year. I picked up a board and case from itxwarehouse.co.uk, and a hard drive and RAM from elsewhere. The box runs on a fanless Via C3 CPU at something like 800MBz (give or take a hundred), is very quiet (there is a case cooling fan, but that's quiet) and is quite powerful enough to serve NFS/SMB/AppleShare files, play MP3s, stream DAAP to iTunes clients, record streaming radio (I have it grabbing streams from 3RRR), and rip/encode the odd CD. It's sitting under my desk, but had I my own flat, it'd probably be in a cupboard somewhere.

Of course, that was last year, so this year's fanless Mini-ITX boards are probably quite a bit faster.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-12 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mjg59.livejournal.com
Remember that if the battery is capable of driving the machine for even a couple of seconds, it'll happily survive brown outs and short power cuts. I've been using a P75 laptop as a gateway for about 5 years now, and it's certainly saved me a couple of times.

Re: My adventures in Mini-ITX

Date: 2006-03-12 09:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kineticfactory.livejournal.com
I've thought of that.

The internal hard drive (a 320Mb SATA drive) has one of those £10 hard disk coolers from Maplin attached to the bottom. (On my other machine, one of those reduced a drive's temperature from >50C to around 30; I haven't measured it on the server, as Linux didn't support SMART data from SATA drives at the time of setup.) For mirroring, I have an external drive in a USB2 enclosure and rsync run on a cron job.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciphergoth.livejournal.com
If your computer costs £300 to put together, consumes *on average* 200W less than what it replaces, and you pay 10p/kWH, it will take over 20 months to pay for itself.

In practice of course it won't be the case that the old one maxed out its 200W PSU at all times while the new consumes not a single Joule in its lifetime.

For a machine that has to be quiet and on all the time, a big box is the way to go. It's easier to make quiet (those 12cm Zalman fans take up space) and you will want to put things in it.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 07:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] specialunclet.livejournal.com
i've supplied the fanless vias to quarries and never had a problem with them, never touched the dirty linux stuff but the can und 2k and xp with little problem provided you dont want good graphics so should be ok for server systems

fujitsu-siemens pcs are just as quiet due to the powersupply fan acting as the chip fan if you do need more power/space

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 09:58 am (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
I have a Zalman flower cooler lying around somewhere.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 10:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ruthi.livejournal.com
Use a Sharp Zaurus! It's small, silent, doesn't take much electricity, and it runs linux!

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 12:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com
I used to use an XBox running Linux, which worked pretty well.

Now I have a regular server upstairs and a wireless Slim Devices Squeezebox in the lounge for playing MP3s/Oggs/radio streams.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-14 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajohnymous.livejournal.com
What's the point of a 'server' that doesn't do >1 NICs, and/or GigE, and/or RAID 5? Are you sure you just don't want an external hard drive?

I'm all for quiet, but that can generally be achieved easily enough with newer power supplies and by attenuating case fan RPMs.

I'd be curious about how much I'm spending on power for running my systems, but I'd also wonder if it's really worth worrying too much about. How many cents does it take to run a system 24x7?

If necessary, contemporary ACPI systems can be suspended to near off and awoken on a schedule or on demand either with a touch of the keyboard or with a packet sent over the LAN when needed.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-14 01:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ajohnymous.livejournal.com
If you're sleeping, shouldn't the system be sleeping too? ACPI S3 mode is as silent as the grave -- no fans and only a blinking light -- and it'll be ready to turn on as soon as you need it.

E.g., I use my (Windows) workstation in the living room as my alarm clock. I have a scheduled task have media player endlessly play a wav file of a rooster crowing starting at 7am. Sometimes (when I remember), I will suspend the PC before going to sleep. It sleeps all night silently, with no fans and using just enough power to keep track of time, until 7am when it wakes up and play the rooster. If I need the system before then, I need only hit a key and it wakes up ready to go in a couple of seconds.

At any rate, if systems fans are noisy, you might try lowering their RPMs with a device like this:
http://www.zalman.co.kr/eng/product/view.asp?idx=14&code=017
(I believe these can also be home made with typical electronics parts, although I wonder if it's much cheaper and worth the trouble.)

I have a server in my closet in a case that came with a 120mm exhaust fan and a 80mm drive bay cage fan that together sounded like a vacuum cleaner. I reduced the fan RPMs to around 900-1200RPM and the box is essentially silent. Newer SATA drives are also essentially silent when idle, and some even during access (like the Seagate 7200.7).


(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-14 07:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zey.livejournal.com
Two words for you, soldier: Mac Mini! :-)

Go for something pre-loved (if you can find one) and its drive space can be expanded through an external Firewire or USB drive if need be.