(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-20 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I suspect it's not market segmentation but the segments.

Concessions for 'the Unwaged' may overlap conveniently with those for students, home-makers, the retired, the disabled, and might even save ink, but they are not the same - basic set theory. How does one prove that one is unwaged? For twenty seven quid I told a stranger I ejaculate Haagen Daz. Hell, to save $1 CANADIAN I claimed to be a student when in fact I was not, and that's a closer match. For £5? I mean, if I'm out and proud about subverting the dominant paradigm of monogamy, why should I sweat stretching the truth regarding my financial status as a student who is also in employment, say?

£7.50, however, is a bad price. In fairness, one should calculate the proportion that the unwaged are likely to represent (which is unlikely to be 50%, even amongst your subscribers), and adjust the price accordingly. Then ignore it, bump tix to £8.30, and trust in folks' assumption that an obscure price reflects a meticulously calculated costing.

I suspect the scrupulous honesty inherent in the community has blinded them to the potential for missed revenue they have exposed themselves to.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags