Quote of the day.
Dec. 22nd, 2007 11:18 pmWhen I see terms like "technically correct" or "politically correct", I think these words were written by someone who has been wrong for so long, and finds it so painful to make corrections, that the last resort is to ridicule correctness, like that kid in the back of the class who doesn't know the answer and so mocks the teacher.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 12:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 12:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 03:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 07:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 07:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 11:34 am (UTC)Sometimes, it's important to ridicule correctness, because the idea that there can be a right and wrong in a given context is not always accurate or useful.
(Nice example of an analogy structured to reinforce the underlying snark there, by the way.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 12:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 05:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 07:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-23 08:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-24 02:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-24 01:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-28 05:46 pm (UTC)I think most supposed cases of political correctness seem to be blown out of proportion, and probably nothing to do with political correctness anyway (e.g., "Baa Baa Rainbow Sheep" was apparently just two nurseries, and the move was intended to be educational, and not due to racial concerns). I've never heard a source for the often quoted "vertically challenged" (and it may stem from Politically Correct Bedtime Stories which was a parody).
It also only seems to be offensive things towards black people, gay people etc that gets labelled "PC gone mad", but not things that might offend white Christian Daily Mail readers, and more serious issues of censorship (e.g., censorship laws that are there because some people are offended by words or pictures) get ignored.