Fine fine wine.
Jan. 8th, 2008 11:36 pmEmail your MP to repeal the offence of blasphemy (courtesy
valkyriekaren).LiveJournal may suck, but GreatestJournal just collapsed under its own crapness.
Vista will fuck you over. Like, duh.
Everyone needs a musical taser!
Stuck at home on call, ending 9am Friday. I am greatly enjoying playing with the Freda, noisy as she may be while her front teeth try to come through. We are utterly, utterly broke. Visitors welcomed, days or evenings.
I'm quite pleased with managing to patch simple table conversion into a MoinMoin wikitext to MediaWiki converter. This is not something you need to care about for a second ... until you're the poor bastard faced with the task.
I'm currently running Minefield, the nightly test versions of Firefox 3. Cute feature: the automatic software update gets you the latest version every two or three days. It's a bit rough, not all your extensions will work yet and some days' versions crash more than they run, but they've done lots of slick little things that make it really worth a try. Nice icon too.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-08 11:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-08 11:52 pm (UTC)The i-tazer is a hoax (I hope..)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 12:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 12:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 12:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 12:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 12:21 am (UTC)Ah yes... GreatestJournal. I remember taking a look (http://hairyears.livejournal.com/131331.html) during the LJ 'Flag Day' drama:
So I was wrong: instead of being smothered by litigation, or simply failing because they are too small to develop the network 'critical mass' necessary for a social site, they failed through being too small to have the technical resources to operate at all.
As for the quality of the comments, I will point out that GJ's most important user constituency consists of those who left LiveJournal because they don't play well with other children. "Hurrah for the differently-socialised", as people say on Wikipedia.
Don't laugh, they're all coming back here.
That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah
Date: 2008-01-09 12:54 am (UTC)The National Secular Society published a letter with more information and arguments.
Stephen Green recently lost his battle to prosecute the BBC for blasphemy over Jerry Springer: the Opera - although it might have been better if he was allowed to proceed (the law might have been finally struck down by the courts - or if not, opposition to it would be strengthened).
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 07:10 am (UTC)FirefoxIceweasel icon(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 11:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 11:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 11:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 02:03 pm (UTC)Basically, MediaWiki looks and works just like Wikipedia, so users feel like it's a Wikipedia of their own. The syntax sucks, like all wiki syntaxes, but it's one they may have used. And MW looks slicker to the user out the box (the default Monobook skin). So MediaWiki has more chance of convincing suits (particularly the sort of suit who thinks he isn't one) to actually use the damn thing, thus giving the efficiencies office wikis do.
Re: That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah
Date: 2008-01-09 02:04 pm (UTC)Re: That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah
Date: 2008-01-09 03:22 pm (UTC)More on this on the British Humanist Association site too:
http://www.humanism.org.uk/site/cms/newsarticleview.asp?article=2408
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 10:15 pm (UTC)Frankly, when we have *already* lost our rights to protest freely, publish freely, speak freely, write freely, avoid detention when found innocent or never charged, avoid extradition without there being a prima facie case to answer put forward and avoid torture in foreign countries, and these losses of freedom are being felt every day, I honestly feel we ought to put our efforts into fighting against restrictions which are causing real damage. But that would be a lot more work, and with a lot more risk, of the sticking-head-above-parapet variety.
More links to form letters about house arrest, extradition or prosecuting the government for being in breach of its own laws, ta!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-09 11:08 pm (UTC)"We are dying by the sword already".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-11 12:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-01-13 05:55 pm (UTC)Mind you, I'd certainly agree that it'll probably be a piece of cake to get blasphemy laws repealed compared to, say, getting the Terrorism Act 2000 (esp s.44!) repealed. They're simply not of much direct benefit at the moment, so I can easily envisage them being repealed for good PR, while any benefit which could be derived from extended blasphemy laws could be found elsewhere instead.