3 and 4 are not dependent on 1 and 2 - the six statements are related in pairs, but are separate statements, not a logical chain. Read again and see if it makes more sense.
I'm speaking loosely and using "dualism" to mean "not physicalism". I don't feel the ambiguity makes much practical difference.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2012-02-15 08:59 am (UTC)I'm speaking loosely and using "dualism" to mean "not physicalism". I don't feel the ambiguity makes much practical difference.