Of course I didn't realise that I wanted to sleep with you until I filled in the LJ compatibility test. In fact, I still don't consciously. But you know, computers never lie... do they?
Hmmm... 25% of the polled people want to sleep with you. If this pattern is repeated over the entire country, I forsee death by dehydration before you satisfy them all.
OK, answering that you'd have sex with yourself - yes, that is do-able. Kind of. But your answer to the second question suggests you consider yourself a psychotic bunny-boiler!
But you know the fruit of my loins is only for youuuu. And childeric. ... and redcountess. And arkady. And, yeah, you're right. But I mean every damn one of them.
Don't ever post anything valuable, breakable, or, well, anything, into Milton Keynes. Really. The postal service here is unusually incompetent and/or outright nasty. We had two postmen prosecuted a couple of years ago for throwing everyone's mail in the canal on days they got bored. Apparently they'd been doing it for years before they got caught - which only happened because the police were dredging for a body...
I'm happy to throw these ones into a Jiffy bag and post them to you if you'd prefer that though. We can figure out the bit in the other direction once we know these ones work for you - it's not like I have a burning need for the extra RAM.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:20 am (UTC)And, is the second one a euphemism?
Very droll with the last.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:40 am (UTC)Ah, it's far too long since I did this type of poll, I should have another one...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:43 am (UTC)Ah - I understand. You're thinking it's some kind of Australian version of cottupy, aren't you?
It isn't. Cottupy involves a lot more finesse and far stronger abdominal muscles.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:46 am (UTC)If it doesn't, then I don't think I'm interested in having sex with him...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:00 am (UTC)I appologise for even suggesting couuupy in public.
Re:
Date: 2003-05-30 09:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:10 am (UTC)Shall we stop spamming Diva's journal now, and take our filth to Trillian?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:13 am (UTC)Well, we could... but then he'll be left being all curios about what cottupy is... Actually, yeah - good plan!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 10:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 10:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 11:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 11:01 am (UTC)Only took me half an hour....
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 12:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 01:51 pm (UTC)Hmm. Glad I don't have a pet rabbit....
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 03:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 03:42 pm (UTC)Although I do plan to be there next Saturday. In the miniskirt. Tarting like the scarlet hooer I am.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:07 am (UTC)Which reminds me, I might well be in London that weekend. Shall I bring that RAM and hook up with you in the Dev on Saturday perhaps?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:28 am (UTC)I'm happy to throw these ones into a Jiffy bag and post them to you if you'd prefer that though. We can figure out the bit in the other direction once we know these ones work for you - it's not like I have a burning need for the extra RAM.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 05:22 pm (UTC)