Of course I didn't realise that I wanted to sleep with you until I filled in the LJ compatibility test. In fact, I still don't consciously. But you know, computers never lie... do they?
Hmmm... 25% of the polled people want to sleep with you. If this pattern is repeated over the entire country, I forsee death by dehydration before you satisfy them all.
But you know the fruit of my loins is only for youuuu. And childeric. ... and redcountess. And arkady. And, yeah, you're right. But I mean every damn one of them.
Don't ever post anything valuable, breakable, or, well, anything, into Milton Keynes. Really. The postal service here is unusually incompetent and/or outright nasty. We had two postmen prosecuted a couple of years ago for throwing everyone's mail in the canal on days they got bored. Apparently they'd been doing it for years before they got caught - which only happened because the police were dredging for a body...
I'm happy to throw these ones into a Jiffy bag and post them to you if you'd prefer that though. We can figure out the bit in the other direction once we know these ones work for you - it's not like I have a burning need for the extra RAM.
OK, answering that you'd have sex with yourself - yes, that is do-able. Kind of. But your answer to the second question suggests you consider yourself a psychotic bunny-boiler!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:20 am (UTC)And, is the second one a euphemism?
Very droll with the last.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:40 am (UTC)Ah, it's far too long since I did this type of poll, I should have another one...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:43 am (UTC)Ah - I understand. You're thinking it's some kind of Australian version of cottupy, aren't you?
It isn't. Cottupy involves a lot more finesse and far stronger abdominal muscles.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 08:46 am (UTC)If it doesn't, then I don't think I'm interested in having sex with him...
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:00 am (UTC)I appologise for even suggesting couuupy in public.
Re:
Date: 2003-05-30 09:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:10 am (UTC)Shall we stop spamming Diva's journal now, and take our filth to Trillian?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 09:13 am (UTC)Well, we could... but then he'll be left being all curios about what cottupy is... Actually, yeah - good plan!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 11:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 11:01 am (UTC)Only took me half an hour....
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 10:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 10:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 03:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 12:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 03:42 pm (UTC)Although I do plan to be there next Saturday. In the miniskirt. Tarting like the scarlet hooer I am.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:07 am (UTC)Which reminds me, I might well be in London that weekend. Shall I bring that RAM and hook up with you in the Dev on Saturday perhaps?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:28 am (UTC)I'm happy to throw these ones into a Jiffy bag and post them to you if you'd prefer that though. We can figure out the bit in the other direction once we know these ones work for you - it's not like I have a burning need for the extra RAM.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 02:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-30 01:51 pm (UTC)Hmm. Glad I don't have a pet rabbit....
(no subject)
Date: 2003-05-31 05:22 pm (UTC)