reddragdiva: (Default)
[personal profile] reddragdiva

I fear I am insufficiently able to slip into the semi-comatose state my job requires.

I have been rereading the fine papers at reciprocality.org. It's a massive expansion of the ideas in The Programmer's Stone (mappers vs. packers - a paper everyone who works in IT should read, by the way). Reciprocality.org is somewhat crackpotty in places, but is generally decently thought-stimulating stuff. Particularly on a Friday at work.

(By the way - the UK Advertising Standards Authority has upheld complaints that there is no proof that ISO9001 does a company any good at all.)

I am also pleased that [livejournal.com profile] sclerotic_rings put in a link to it. That's Paul T. Riddell's popular science weblog, which I highly recommend.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-08-08 08:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffymormegil.livejournal.com
I like the "M0" document.

ISO9001

Date: 2003-08-08 08:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sclerotic-rings.livejournal.com
I had my suspicions that ISO9001 did no good, but it's nice to get it confirmed. I can't tell you the number of times I've been quizzed by companies about my understanding of ISO9001, only to discover that these same companies cannot move forward because of the logjam of paperwork required by the protocols. Actually, it's not a set of standards at all: it's a classic CYA exercise.

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags