reddragdiva: (Default)
[personal profile] reddragdiva
  • Australia: a nation of pooftahs. SEVENTEEN PER CENT!

  • Joe Strummer Remembrance Sunday, Brighton, November 9th. Includes a Carter USM non-reformation.

  • "The mainstream consumer has made it absolutely plain time and time again that the price he or she will pay for standard new-release items of leisure software, be they books, movies, pop albums, graphic novels, concert tickets or absolutely anything else, is £15, give or take a couple of quid ... Development costs just don't come into it. They're nothing but a red herring."

  • Probabilities in Monopoly.

I believe I have one of these 'lives,' amongst the geeky whining. Last Monday I went to the Dev with [livejournal.com profile] arkady, and my goodness I've missed it. Howdy to [livejournal.com profile] bootpunk. Tuesday, [livejournal.com profile] redcountess and I had a Quiet Night In. I think we watched The Blues Brothers again.

Wednesday I visited [livejournal.com profile] arkady in St Albans and discovered that, although the Casio MP3 Watch is really quite 'l33t, the software is crapware of such proportions as to reliably crash Windows XP when you try to upload certain files. Why in God's name don't these fuckers just make their gadgets umass devices? What's the fucking problem?

(I willingly fix [livejournal.com profile] arkady's XP box for her. It must be love.)

Thursday we watched [livejournal.com profile] silveraj on Richard and Judy. I also had a win on the beer from Sainsburys - we ordered three bottles of Hobgoblin on a three-for-two deal, then discovered the bottles in question had a bonus "32% free." Mmm, beer.

Friday we had another Quiet Night In, after a Bugger of a Week. Saturday I took care of [livejournal.com profile] redcountess and [livejournal.com profile] arkady. And went onto #uk_goffs for the first time in almost a year. I also cleaned up FUCKING UNBELIEVABLE QUANTITIES OF WINDOWS VIRUSES. Sunday I sent [livejournal.com profile] arkady off to work and settled in for a lovely quiet day with the Liz.

Yesterday I discovered the part of the company I work for is to be sold. Except the subsection I work for, which won't be. This may help explain why I've been having an interesting time of late dealing with some workplace issues. Not that everyone here (and across this industry) isn't quite used to working for four companies in three years while doing the same job at the same desk.

We also saw an actual new episode of Never Mind The Buzzcocks.

The rats have worked out how to escape their cage. I foresee a larger playground for them in the near future.

Cosy Domesticity: it's dull, but it's cheap!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 05:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com

Not that everyone here (and across this industry) isn't quite used to working for four companies in three years while doing the same job at the same desk.


That's me!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 06:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenmonkeykstop.livejournal.com
That's what you get when your randomly chosen survey cities are San Francisco and Sydney.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 06:06 am (UTC)
ext_5856: (Default)
From: [identity profile] flickgc.livejournal.com
Oi! Tart!

Got any Tam Tams? Apparently I have to try The Suck...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 06:21 am (UTC)
ext_5856: (Default)
From: [identity profile] flickgc.livejournal.com
Are you *sure* (http://www.livejournal.com/users/tboy/277531.html?thread=1543963) that you don't?

[pouts]

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 07:27 am (UTC)
vatine: Generated with some CL code and a hand-designed blackletter font (Default)
From: [personal profile] vatine
And then B&K ate them all! It should be forbidden, I say. Forbidden!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 06:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] giolla.livejournal.com
I discovered the part of the company I work for is to be sold. Except the subsection I work for, which won't be.

You mean you could work out what bits where being sold and what weren't?? I'm impressed.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 06:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arkady.livejournal.com
For some reason that link to the Australian pooftahs story won't work for me on either Mozilla or Opera.

(Not that I'm interested in pooftahs. Australian or otherwise. Um. Look over there!!)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 06:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arkady.livejournal.com
Heh. Still have no idea why Mozilla doesn't like the link....

Hmm. The company said faking orgasms was also common in Australia, with 47 per cent of respondents admitting to doing so at least once.

*raises an eyebrow*

Does this mean whilst the Australians are getting laid more often than the Yanks, the sex is bad enough that they have to fake it??

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-24 06:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
ITYM; "Certainly not!"
"Ah. Would you mind lying down while I have one?"

I doubt you have the Canadians beat - when I was in Toronto I met only one woman who was not a lesbian.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 08:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simonb.livejournal.com
MP3 players

The Register had an article about micro MP3 players, the cutest being a Sony one which was basically a pair of outer-ear headphones with a builtin MP3 player. It suffered from the problem of not being umass device tho. Its one reason why I prefer the MP3 player I've got which takes a CF card - easy to put it into your umass device of choice that way.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 08:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] simonb.livejournal.com
Perhaps its the cost of the chipsets ? That or the pointy-haired ones or the marketing goons like to think that their crap software "enhances the customers experience" by only letting them use their device with the software they use. I mean, if they used umass then the customers could make use of the devices with anything which understood umass.

It could also be due to umass having crawling horrors when compared to ugen (although I doubt this) or the makers of the ugen chipset provide a suitable SDK so the OEMs can easily throw together something which works.

Alternatively it could be due to ugen being available before umass so there is an inertia behind ugen.... you'll end up with PHBs having to defend their teams (more likely empires) of software developers who produce the crap software which works with the ugen interface against the umass interface which wouldn't require the software and thus the large teams of developers.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-23 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
The cost of developer time tends to zero as the item tends towards mass-market consumer so if the chipset is even slightly cheaper (as Simes says) they will use it.
Given that developer time is zero-cost, the problem of it being a braindead design requiring extra programmer time to sort out does not figure in any accounts, so even if they pick a ugen chip for nontechnical reasons (better blow jobs from the vendor saleschick or whatever) there's still no measurable loss to them.
If there was standard software so that they could avoid having to ship any software at all with such widgets, then they would pick umass because shipping software costs money; media costs money you can measure and it's a per-item cost. They just won't notice having to ship hard-to-write software over shipping easy-to-write software.

Rats

Date: 2003-09-23 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inulro.livejournal.com
I've got your new rat cage sitting under my dining room table. One weekend soon when I don't feel like dying and can convince Jason to drive us up to London, I'll deliver it.

"Australia, nation of Poofahs.."

Date: 2003-09-23 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] severina-242.livejournal.com
Wow, there is hope for us yet! I think that deserves a celebration.... party at my house!!!!

Hello there

Date: 2003-09-24 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] random-haze.livejournal.com
'Scuse my buttin' in sir, but I have a question.
I've been trying to find out when the next B-movie is (there's nothing on the site apart from when the last one was). When googling for this info just now, it brought up a link to one of your journal entries where you mention B-movie, so I thought I'd take a long shot and ask if you know when the next one is, by any chance?

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-24 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] random-haze.livejournal.com
thankyou dear ^_^ as you can probably tell I haven't been before. Am trying to broaden my club outlook from just slimes and the ballroom.

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-24 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] random-haze.livejournal.com
heh, snap! Won't be going out this week (not clubbing anyhow) but might be conned into going to slime next week for a mates Bday week end

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-24 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Second Friday of _every_ month, so far, plus the occasional special. The "bmovie" community will have the details, but I don't know any reason why the usual suspects shouldn't be in a sleazy bar on the 10th of October as usual.

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-30 04:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
No problem, the more the merrier. Having said that, bear in mind that it does usually fill up around 11pm, and on the very heaviest nights it's been impossible to get in without waiting a fair bit if you don't turn up before that.

This doesn't affect me; I always show up at 8pm, because there's nothing bugs me more than a club opening time that drifts backwards because no-one wants to show up before any of their friends - so at least anyone who knows me knows it's a fairly safe bet they'll have someone to talk to whenever they show up.

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-30 04:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] random-haze.livejournal.com
Cool. Not sure if I'll be going yet, but probly see you there if I do.

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-30 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
Ah... what do you look like?

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-30 06:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] random-haze.livejournal.com
well. i look like my icon... what do you look like Mr. DOS man?

Re: Hello there

Date: 2003-09-30 09:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damerell.livejournal.com
's not DOS. :-)

http://www.velvet.net/~fun/ukpix/030110/25-damerell-ali-martin.jpg
and
http://www.velvet.net/~fun/ukpix/030314-bmovie/IMG_0899.jpg

have me in (I'm the guy with blonde hair, not the guy sticking his tongue out or the pretty girl...) in fairly typical clothes.