Hmm. Someone has just deleted
all their comments from my most recent
cri de
coeur concerning Windows as plague pit, under merciless
questioning from
damerell.
(Let me state here that David Damerell is a fine fellow with a proper appreciation of real ale and is jolly nice in person. I'm sure his modem balls are a feature rather than a bug.)
These comments were to a public post, they were up in public for a week before deletion, and I have them in my LJ Replies mail folder.
[Poll #186322]I shall, of course, reserve my personal opinion, so as not to bias your selection.
Never say anything online you don't want around for years.
(I did keep my original response to "You are being grossly half-smart.")
Update: To switch off animation of GIFs in Mozilla or Firebird, enter about:config in the address bar, enter anim in the filter and it will bring up image.animation_mode - set to 'none' for no animation, 'once' for a single run-through, 'normal' to loop forever.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Unfortunately...
Date: 2003-09-30 04:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 03:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 04:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-01 02:12 am (UTC)You can send them over to my rants if you like. This one as well. I'm sure they'll be well pleased.
"I'm sorry I ran over all those people, but it's not like I can be expected to know how to drive! I'm not a mechanic, you know!"
redirecting good rewriting bad
Date: 2003-09-30 04:05 pm (UTC)but if you re-post them yourself this is like copying them out yourself, and even f**wits should have their "copyright" respected. It's not cut and dried -- I can think of arguments that counter what I've written above (too lazy to write them down but). So I guess I'm saying that *personally*, I would feel comfortable pointing to the spot where the comments still exist, but would not feel comfortable re-posting them myself.
Re: redirecting good rewriting bad
Date: 2003-09-30 04:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 05:17 pm (UTC)You can of course post whatever you want. Including things that have been deleted.
You can also pick your nose in public.
People probably aren't going to applaud when you do either tho'.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 05:42 pm (UTC)Actually, it's much more entertaining _without_ the inane posts in the middle. This way, you just get pure, unsullied
OH...
Date: 2003-09-30 07:04 pm (UTC)After all...they were my comments!
But don't think I'll feel any differently...I told you why I deleted them
But don't wory about it...I don't expect any more of either of you...In fact, this is just the kind of infantile behaviour I expected.
So, go right ahead...I stand behind everything I said
Re: OH...
Date: 2003-09-30 08:49 pm (UTC)Re: OH...
From:Re: OH...
Date: 2003-09-30 10:56 pm (UTC)Re: OH...
From:Re: OH...
From:Re: OH...
From:Re: OH...
Date: 2003-10-01 01:28 am (UTC)If you stood by the comments, then you wouldn't have deleted them.
Assuming you were actually the original poster and aren't just grandstanding here.
Re: OH...
Date: 2003-12-19 09:40 am (UTC)?
Date: 2003-09-30 11:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 11:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-01 01:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-01 12:05 am (UTC)Not so much...
Date: 2003-10-01 12:53 am (UTC)*Regardless of whether I agree with them or not, it's the least i can do, given that I'm not gonna agree with them...By the end I was being outright offensive on purpose...and that's not a legacy I wish to leave on someone else's LJ for all-and-sundry to see
What happened to...
Date: 2003-10-01 12:48 am (UTC)Re: What happened to...
Date: 2003-10-01 01:34 am (UTC)Re: What happened to...
From:Re: What happened to...
From:Re: What happened to...
From:moon on a stick, please
From:Re: moon on a stick, please
From:Re: moon on a stick, please
From:(no subject)
From:Since noone has actually addressed this yet...
From:Re: Since noone has actually addressed this yet...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:P.S.,
From:Re: Since noone has actually addressed this yet...
From:(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-01 03:54 am (UTC)It's far better to add a second comment staring that it was wrong and withdrawing it rather then just deleting, if the offended person agrees then remove. But some people never want to admit they ever did anything wrong.
I've seen situations where one person has said something, it's created a response in another LJ and then they've deleted the original without discussing it, ( and banning further comments ) leaving things looking like it was started by the second person.
As for whether it's right to publish the material, well probably best top avoid quoting but it would be reasonable to give the gist of the deleted post that caused the offence and also allow the person to resonpond to that.
I guess I take option 7 - Other ;)
tuppence
Date: 2003-10-01 05:05 am (UTC)I think this would probably have been the best response - the guilty party in this claims to have removed the comments because they were offensive, though as the offense has already been caused it doesn't entirely stand up (not for the early comments anyway). Reading into the replies it does seem that they don't know how to argue very effectively.
Something similar happened to me a while ago - my attention was brought to a none-too-complimentary post about me, I wrote a considered reply, genuinely trying to get to the bottom of whatever problem the person in qustion had with me (which she has never made any attempt to do). Her response was to reply to my comment with a 'you're childish' and then delete what I had written (presumably so that her friends wouldn't see that I was willing to be reasonable, and that any problems she had were her problems).
np: Type O Negative - My Girlfriend's Girlfriend / Christian WomanRe: tuppence
From:Re: tuppence
From:(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-03 06:14 am (UTC)Better yet, post the salient part of the thread to
(no subject)
Date: 2003-10-04 10:17 pm (UTC)