Pills 'n' thrills and bellyaches.
May. 8th, 2009 11:58 pmOpenOffice user survey — please help.
Why Ubuntu 9.04 is the best thing you could do. Update: Applies to any Linux in the past three years. Original LJ post.
Sunlight causes suicide (courtesy
hellsop).
It's been a busy day with a severely active Freda, who has been lovely and charming and beautiful IN HUGE QUANTITIES. Took her out for a walk on a leash in the morning then in the pram in the afternoon. Lots of playing out back on the trike. Lots of telly. It's been a lovely day with the most demanding and wonderful girlfriend ever in the world. So there.
A question: what's the state of the art in cheap film scanners? My use case is two boxes of twenty years' 35mm negatives. I know not to touch anything flatbed. I was tempted by the cheap Ion one (the turntable is cheap but cheerful), but the Amazon reviews put me right off. I can live with colours being off as long as the highlights aren't blown and the images are sharp. I can even live with Windows-only. Anyone bought a film scanner recently?
Fantastically useful DreamWidth feature: when you edit a crossposted article on DW, it automatically edits the copy on LJ as well. This level of attention to detail augurs well.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 03:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 09:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 10:06 am (UTC)But I believe it's something they plan to add.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-11 07:02 am (UTC)Too bloody cold to top yourself.
But a visit to Palmerston North should do the trick.
I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-08 11:23 pm (UTC)Basically, it's the Epsons from $100 (whatever in pounds) to $750, then the big jump to Nikon 9000 or the 35 mm only one that's $1200 or so. If you're just shooting slides, look at the various Coolscans from Nikon. If you want to get away cheaper and aren't blowing things up beyond 8x10, the Epsons flatbeds for photographs seem to do the job well enough for the web. I've got some scanned with that on my photo.net site.
Basically, it's the Epsons from $100 (whatever in pounds) to $750, then the big jump to Nikon 9000 or the 35 mm only one that's $1200 or so. If you're just shooting slides, look at the various Coolscans from Nikon. If you want to get away cheaper and aren't blowing things up beyond 8x10, the Epsons flatbeds for photographs seem to do the job well enough for the web. I've got some scanned with that on my photo.net site. <a "href=http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6104783" This rose</a> is a 100% crop from a scanned 35 mm transparency. The flatbed scanners do transparencies better than they do negatives.
If you have friends, go together on the Nikon dedicated film scanner if money is an object. It will do a better job, but the Epsons seem to be the most recommended among the online film folks, as flatbeds go.
I recommend VueScan as software on the Mac; don't know what the equivalent is for Windows.
Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-08 11:27 pm (UTC)The annoying thing about the Ion is that it appears the horrible software is the weak point - the hardware is as cheap as could be expected, but would be fine if the software weren't shit.
Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-08 11:33 pm (UTC)If I were in your position, I'd consider seeing about getting a used Coolscan new enough to be a USB beastie, feeding it your slides and then selling it. A fair number of people appear to work this way because they show up fairly frequently on the auction sites.
If I had money and was in your position, I'd hire it done.
Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-09 12:23 am (UTC)Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-09 01:02 am (UTC)I remember when people in Philly gave each other small sub-gig SCSI drives to sweeten trades and get the damned things out of ones own house. They never worked.
Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-09 09:23 am (UTC)There's a reason for the jokes about SCSI and black candles and sacrificing goats.
Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-09 12:52 pm (UTC)Most of those old 500 mg drives were just dead and no amount of goats was going to bring them back.
I did have two SCSI external drives in a case for my news server. You're bringing back memories.
Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-08 11:31 pm (UTC)Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-08 11:41 pm (UTC)Re: I've got the Epson 4490 Photo
Date: 2009-05-08 11:47 pm (UTC)My favorite is the drummer, but I can't remember whether I scanned that from the medium format negative or from a print (it is out of the Epson). I'll be doing some test 35 mm scans of negative film after the negatives dry.
sunny suicides
Date: 2009-05-08 11:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 12:19 am (UTC)About a decade of Windows updates (I was a DOS man until 1995 or when I made the switch to Windows 3.1) I'm inherently distrusting of any updates on a perfectly well working machine.
Of course, if I install the update and it doesn't quite a re-start I shall probably cry like a baby with glee.
Summer suicides? Huh. Wierd. I wonder if there's a corresponding increase here in Sunsetland. Apparently we're not going to see any autumn weather until the end of May at least.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 12:21 am (UTC)In the case of Ubuntu, keep it while security updates are being produced for the version you're running. When those stop, back up your documents, cross your fingers and upgrade.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:06 am (UTC)Yes.
When 9.04 was released (and possibly still -- I wouldn't know), the wireless networking tool it insisted you use did not support WPA.
I am not impressed with Ubuntu.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 09:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 09:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 07:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 07:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 01:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-09 05:30 am (UTC)Takes bloody ages to do all the scanning though!