![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
At work, God help me. Parts of the tube are in fact running. The city is quiet — most people seem to be remembering 2002 and aren't bothering. So I got a train to Liverpool St, the Met to Baker Street and walked from there. Bah!
The office is a ghost town. Lots of people are getting calls at home, which serves them right and teaches them that "working from home" is only partially a euphemism for "day off."
Tube drivers are paid a lot because it's actually an incredibly stressful job — driving a train with a thousand people's lives in your hands down a black tunnel where you can see nothing, several hours a day every day, does your head in. Not to mention the train suicides. The unsociable hours allowance is also a large chunk of the cash, and they get good holidays because they bloody need them. Take care not to fall into the trap of "I don't do it so it must be simple."
(I know nurses have it worse. That doesn't make it right.)
That said, Bob Crow is in fact a fuckhead. Ask arkady about this and stand back while she rants.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:39 am (UTC)It's a TREMENDOUS help that people are actively trying to work from home today. There should be more of this.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:47 am (UTC)For a lot of people it cause extreme inconvenience and unhappiness and stress.
I agree with striking in over safety issues etc and in case of grossly unfair pay structures that haven't been looked at in years etc. Unions are meant to be for the workers, but they're not showing any solidarity with workers who aren't them! 4 day weeks? Please
I also think that anyone who is striking should be on a picket line for their work hours or should be disciplined. You're either protesting or you're not and a strike is not a day off
to watch a Euro 2004 semi-finalOther countries Undergrounds' workers have striked by worked but refusing to collect any fares ...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:50 am (UTC)And the not collecting fares or penalties method of industrial action really does work well. The public service in Australia favours this one. (Not bothering with pissy penalties tends to make their actual work much more efficient too ... no, I don't have numbers to hand.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:52 am (UTC)Yeah, I'm all for alternative ways of working. It's just for people who really can't do their work like that, or tourists who arrive in London today, or old people etc.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:54 am (UTC)That would be me. Gah!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 06:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 10:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 06:37 am (UTC)And some monkeys on site to swap discs, etc.
Unfortunately many managers do not realise that 24x7 operation means either having your systems remotely operable or paying sysadmins to be next to them 24x7.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:49 am (UTC)I do know this and it's not that complicated really :-)
My point was that this strike is not just about tube drivers salaries and definitely not all drivers support it.
Also I went past at least 10 tube stations on my journey to work today. I didn't see one actual picket line.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:35 am (UTC)Do I really go off on one that badly??
Well. He is a fuckhead.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:38 am (UTC)He singularly fails to realise how he will play in the media. Strikers can garner considerable public sympathy if they play it right - he doesn't. I assume he thinks he wants to do well by his union's members ...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:40 am (UTC)Thanks for that... I had heard a few people doing the "how hard can it be, it seems like they're paid loads" thing.
I'm very pro-union in general but Bob Crow does seem like a bit of an advert for how to get people's backs up -- plus I'm quite a fan of TfL and he seems to want to tip the board over in a sulk there.
For some reason I was visiting london during the strike in 2002 and it was really funny to see Londoners blinking like moles and actually walking around the city as clearly lost as I was.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:20 am (UTC)Why can't we do that to the rest of the tube system, so that we don't need drivers?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:31 am (UTC)The DLR is running today not because they don't have drivers, but because the RMT aren't indispute with its management.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:35 am (UTC)The Victoria line is the line that has had ATO (Automatic Train Operation) the longest; it was the simplest to convert due to its relatively short length and lack of branches or other complications. This was followed by the Central line, although for the most part it was only the actual tunnel sections that were ATO; the safety case for extending ATO to the whole of the Central line was only approved a couple of years ago. ATO was only introduced fully on the Jubilee line with the completion of the Jubilee Line Extension and the introduction of the new signalling system.
In order to bring in ATO on other lines, an extensive overhaul and rebuild of the signalling systems would be required together with drastic alterations and modifications to the existing fleets. It would be necessary to shut down entire lines for weeks on end whilst the necessary work was completed.
And at the end of all that, LUL would still not be able to do away with drivers. It was only possible on the DLR because it was designed right from the outset to run without drivers and be totally automated. If you tried to do away with drivers on the Underground, there would be uproar from all the unions. It was bad enough when they did away with guards - and a vast majority of LUL staff believe guards ought to be brought back.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 05:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 06:15 am (UTC)Another risk not yet highlighted is suicides - I understand that is horrific for the driver.
Those who are complaining should think about the number of strikes in many European countries - we have far less than most and I _think_ that strikes are at the lowest level ever in the UK.
So don't whinge!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 06:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 06:24 am (UTC)It would also have been horrific for the station staff who came down to deal with the incident; and for the memebers of the ERU (Emergency Response Unit) who had to extract the pieces of the person from beneath the train. You have to go through extensive psychological testing to become a member of the ERU; they have to deal with some very disturbing stuff.
The worst of it is that 60% of would-be suicides actually survive. 60%! I don't know about you - but I think I'd rather choose a more sure-fire method with better odds of success.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 11:06 am (UTC)Anyway, for what its worth, I agree, both on the train drivers and Bob Crowe.
Topic hijacking
Date: 2004-06-30 07:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 07:11 am (UTC)*slightly embarrassed wave* We've not met (yet) but we have several friends in common, and I was hoping to use a photo from your gallery for something, but it's not available. Did you get an email from me a couple of days ago?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:07 am (UTC)http://reddragdiva.fotopic.net/p4356766.html
I'm helping lolliepopp with some organising and she said you wouldn't mind my using a photo from your gallery... Yes, it's entirely possible my email got deleted as spam. I thought of entitling it THIS IS NOT SPAM but that probably wouldn't have helped. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 09:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-06-30 04:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-06 02:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-06 03:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-06 03:12 pm (UTC)