Choo choo choo it's a prison of sound!
Apr. 18th, 2005 01:06 amI am loving reading Paul Graham at the moment. His theme for the past year or so has been to encourage geeks to make buckets of money.
(Paul Graham is a highly advanced geek. You know the spam filter in Gmail and Thunderbird? Paul Graham came up with the original idea.)
"The hard part about figuring out what customers want is figuring out that you need to figure it out ... That's the essence of a startup: having brilliant people do work that's beneath them ... take people so smart that they would in a big company be doing 'research,' and set them to work instead on problems of the most immediate and mundane sort. Think Einstein designing refrigerators."
I'm very smart indeed, smarter than most people I know, but I'm not that smart. Quite a lot of you reading this are way more brilliant than me. But at least I can try to get clues and get there more slowly.
I've been stalled on the business plan for about two weeks now. (I know the next three steps; things have just been rather frantic, with my heavy schedule of job hunting, housework and panicking.) I'm realising I'll need to think on whether I've even got the right idea ... As I write this,
arkady is sewing doll clothes, which is a good example of someone of talent doing work beneath them. It's very motivating.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 12:34 am (UTC)Ask Arkady if she's read Our Mutual Friend by Charles Dickens. The character, Jenny Wren, is a dolls' dressmaker, with business cards and everything. She also gestures her needle at people, as if she's poking their eyes out :)
This is brought on, of course, by the massive studying for prelims going on. My brain is making connections it shouldn't ever make.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 12:53 am (UTC)Not entirely sure I accept his argument about wealth inequality being harmless; it seems to be predicated on the Thatcherian axiom that there is no such thing as society, only a marketplace.
His arguments about elegant and inelegant programming languages, however, are spot on. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 06:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 08:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 09:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 06:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 07:15 am (UTC)If you want to just hack something together for a lark you're probably better off sticking with python.
If you want to explore a problem domain where there's no clear route from A to B then LISP is great. The kinds of data structures and coding styles that you can use are pretty much only limited by your imagination.
It's like working with putty instead of lego.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 07:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 01:56 am (UTC)-- A <3
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 02:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 08:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 11:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 12:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 04:38 pm (UTC)Painting has proven to be marvellous therapy on some levels -- my art has always been a solace and a place to vent emotions, but painting works in a way that drawing doesn't always -- even if inspiration has momentarily deserted me, I can still work on filling in backgrounds or layering hair textures.
Good luck with the crocheting :>
-- A, on Day Two of Extreme Splat To The Point Of Not Getting Out Of Bathrobe, off to see pdoc in a couple of hours :/
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 05:26 pm (UTC)Fortunately, I have to Get Dressed in order to GO to the appointment, so I am now clothed, which is progress. I always feel better when I've had a good bath, and I'm fanatically clean -- part of the reason why Bathrobe Days are so alarming is that feeling grungy gives me such a lousy emotional state, but I just can't snap myself out of it.
I'll be packing for Convergence today . . . hopefully I'll fit into some of the stuff I'm planning on wearing!!
Good luck is most appreciated :>
-- A <3
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 07:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 07:55 pm (UTC);-*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 05:04 pm (UTC)Or, to quote Ian Curtis: "I used to work in a factory and I was really happy because I could daydream all day."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 09:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 11:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 06:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 08:07 am (UTC)Want me to look at it?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 11:50 am (UTC)The stall has been because I've been ridiculously busy with other stuff including, of course, panicking about being severely cash strapped! Tch ...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 08:12 am (UTC)he did, or at least a motor for one
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 09:46 am (UTC)Reminder to self: sort out interview for that part-time MSc.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 12:08 pm (UTC)And, in fact, I'm looking at changing career again to get something that I'll find more interesting, so... (qualification will take a good few years, though).
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 05:12 pm (UTC)One of the other people here changed his working arrangements to work 4 days a week at a 20% pay cut (as he has a business on the side). Perhaps it's something to keep in mind?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:31 am (UTC)What are you studying, btw? A further degree carrying on from previous degrees, or something totally new?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:36 am (UTC)Psychology sounds interesting; it's something I've found myself reading a lot about over the past few years. I imagine that, were I to go back to university and do another degree, it'd be in that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 10:42 pm (UTC)What are you looking at studying?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-20 06:53 am (UTC)Part-time study: done that, it's very rewarding - wait 'til you meet your fellow-students, the 'matures' are very different to the kiddies who've come up straight from school!
I think you'll enjoy it, despite (or maybe because of) the life of essay deadlines and project work. But I'm prepared to bet that, five years into doing it for a living, you'll think to yourself that the journey from here to there was just as fulfilling as the destination. Maybe more so: you'll look around and start developing your skills again...
...Which is a long way 'round to saying that you'll come to see my point of view about developing and working to the limit of your capabilities. A limit which is always far more than you ever believed was possible; more rewarding, more fulfilling, more fun, more life.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-20 09:39 am (UTC)I don't want a job that doesn't stretch me some of the time; but I *do* want a job that I can do in less than the time for which they pay me, because that frees me up to do other things in the rest of the time. Sometimes, those other things are the life-maintenance things (which means that my evenings are clear to do things I can't do/can't get away with at work); sometimes there are other interests that I *can* keep up with at work during my free time.
Basically, I don't see my paid job as of overwhelming importance in my life, although I freely admit that I wouldn't want something that isn't stretching when I *do* do the work for which I'm actually paid. And one of the reasons for my retraining is that I think I'd find that more interesting than what I do now; and also that I'm deliberately getting into something where constant retraining/development is an *obligatory* part of the job.
Of course, what I *actually* want is to get paid about what I am now (maybe a little extra), but for working only about 50% of the time. This would avoid the slight inconvenience of the current setup, which involves me sitting in front of my desk 34 hrs/week even when I'm not *actually* doing work. I'd settle for that arrangement but with less pay. This is what I'm aiming for with the psychology, in fact, although it'll work rather differently than a similar arrangement in my current job would.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 01:44 pm (UTC)I don't feel that a normal 9-5 job should have to use all of my abilities, intellectual, creative or otherwise, in order for me to feel fulfilled - but being trapped into a job where I have to use them would very rapidly sour any enjoyment I take in them and probably kill off what talent I have.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 11:02 pm (UTC)For the most part, I'm doing the dolls for me
If the Bank thinks that any of us are geeking for the greater glory of Shareholder Value and the General Economic Good they are sadly mistaken. I geek for the sheer joy of it: it's what I am, not just what I do from nine to five. Or from eight to eight.
And I really don't mean nine-to-fiving when I say 'bright people working below their capability'.
Very, very few people can cheerfully chew and swallow the gristle and bile of a banking job - or any of the things that make you almost well-to-do in London - but I'd like to think that all that talent that's ticking over in undemanding jobs is enriching it's owners in other ways: social, artistic, musical, political, literary, charitable and educational. Or just plain fun.
FWIW, pursuing a craft or creative pastime for you and for the joy of it will probably produce better art, and a better use of your capabilities - and a quality of life that I would envy - and will probably leave you, too, wondering why people who have so much to offer end up settling for so little.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 03:21 pm (UTC)And he seems to have deluded himself into thinking that Bayesian is a cureall silver bullet for spam
It was rather good fun getting together with a bunch of people who do know what in the trenches spam filtering is, and puncture his balloon a bit, back in late 2003 at the John Harvard brewpub in Boston, where he and Simson Garfinkel were the experts in a "meet the expert" program organized by a magazine (SciAm I think). He's just pompous enough to make an excellent, and appropriate target for a lot of balloon puncturing.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-18 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 10:49 pm (UTC)NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
NO! I'M LARS ULRICH!!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 10:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 11:01 pm (UTC)