Kicking against the pricks.

[reddragdiva]

"Making me wear pants is like making me wear a gag. It denies me a whole range of expression."

Comments

[feanelwa.livejournal.com]

It TALKS? I want one even more now.

[reddragdiva]

It sort of gestures expressively. I expect a prosthesis could do at least as well. Then there's the million things you can say with an arse.

[feanelwa.livejournal.com]

Like Ace Ventura.

[axy-666.livejournal.com]

Assholeaaaaaaaaaaaamioooooooooo *giggles*

[siani-hedgehog.livejournal.com]

It sort of gestures expressively.

gives a sort of "thumbs up", you mean?

[davefish.livejournal.com]

Yeah, but you don't get any influence on what it says. What happens if you end up with a chav? It could refuse to co-operate after a nightclub, unless it ges a burberry condom with blue underlighting.

[reddragdiva]

That's the problem. They don't just talk, they think and make important decisions. (That's what most of them are used for.)

[ronebofh.livejournal.com]

"Yes, but it's done for the safety and comfort of others."

[axy-666.livejournal.com]

/agreed :)

[ashbet]

*eyebrow*

Just as long as you don't frighten the horses, I suppose ;)

-- A ^-^

[ajohnymous.livejournal.com]

"Making me wear pants is like making me wear a gag. It denies me a whole range of expression."

Actually, not wearing pants would not have anywhere near the expressive power it does for you if it were not forbidden.

Every act of difference includes, and depends upon, an act of a deference.

As Andrew Eldritch put it, "even the counter-points to a tradition are part of the tradition itself."

Count your lucky stars for all of the people in life who tell you 'no' -- you would be nothing without them.

[reddragdiva]

Be thankful there's no way to use pantless expression on Usenet.