B-Movie was the Night of the Living Ixus. I took the Ixus 50 to use and the Ixus i to show people (
goth_twiglet was really quite taken with it).
hazyjayne or someone near her had an Ixus 750, which really is very 'l33t and the huge LCD is actually useful.
kjersti bitched at length about her crappy Casio and wished she had an Ixus again. I severely tempted
hsw to just get an Ixus 30/40/50.
eyeliner297 was going wild with her shiny new old Ixus v2 as well. Hey kid, yer first Ixus is cheap!
This person was heard to claim, wearing this outfit at this club, that she really wasn't a goth.
I was doing a lot of continuous shooting (hold the button down to get several shots), which worked really well at ISO 400 outside. I got somewhere over 200 shots, will probably put up about 100-150 and am increasingly concluding that flash just plain sucks and should be avoided as absolutely far as possible. The pics won't be up for a while — the host reddragdiva.co.uk was on is still offline, and I want to move it to the new server properly then start adding new stuff. (I have all the pics on hand, but not a backup of the MySQL data.) Actually, I should just switch to the new host and put a "restoring soon" notice on it. Hmm.
Everyone stayed home to avoid the stifling saunalike heat ... what this meant was there were few enough people that the sauna effect didn't happen. Mind you, I spent most of the evening outside anyway, with Abi and
secretlondon. With
vampwillow and
abigailb in attendance, helping represent the Wikipedia Cabal.
Tonight is Swarf at Slimes and Antilight.
arkady is still completely buggered from the heat, so I fear Antilight is looking much less likely. But I am about to start getting ready properly for the gig. How did it get to be six already, and why is it still so buggering hot?
Update: Liz is too unwell to be left tonight, so I'll need to stay home. Ah well.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:30 pm (UTC)It was good to finally meet up with you and your shiny tempting camera.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:47 pm (UTC)make it stop.
It's just too hot to even think about getting dressed
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:37 pm (UTC)(well, that is my story and I'm attempting to stick to it ...)
ps. I'm not a goth, either ;-P
ps. I'm not a goth, either ;-P
Date: 2006-06-10 05:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:49 pm (UTC)Re: ps. I'm not a goth, either ;-P
Date: 2006-06-10 10:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 05:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 11:16 pm (UTC)(I'm one of those USAnian lunatics who does 16th century reenactment in the southern California heat. Full Elizabethan middle class dress when it's 37C. Then go do country dances in the sun. Madness doesn't even begin to cover it.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 12:02 am (UTC)One of my icons was taken by someone working for the BBC on a weekend when it went past 38 in the shade lots of places, very probably including the shadeless field I was working in all day. We had dayglow tabards to wear, so we kept cool by making sure the Tshirts under them were wet. A litre of water is good for nearly an hour in high-thirties heat. It's an enormously sound tactic.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 07:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 07:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 07:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 11:58 pm (UTC)Their decision may be a good one commercially, of course. Photographing clubbers may not be a big market.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 12:40 am (UTC)Clubbability is actually an increasing market for these things - almost any digital ultracompact does fine in daylight, but low-light performance is markedly different between models. However, the clubbing market requires a camera to be tiny.
In any case, anyone can do well with a great big light bucket on the front of their camera. There's hack value in getting the often really rather nice shots I do with something small enough not to piss me off ;-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 12:53 am (UTC)The other two ways are to increase the width of the optics (expensive and bulky) or to increase the quantum efficiency of the sensor (also expensive, but without the size penalty).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 08:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-10 08:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 11:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 11:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-23 01:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-23 11:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-23 11:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 05:19 pm (UTC)But-but-but...
You're just not getting this, are you?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 05:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 05:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 05:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-06-11 05:36 pm (UTC)