More stupid Rocknerd breakage.
Sep. 21st, 2006 02:30 pmThere have been two stories on Rocknerd since the John Peel one ... but they don't seem to show up when you aren't logged in.
*headdesk*
How feasible would it be to pour the data out of Slash and into a CMS
that doesn't suck as much? At least as a static copy. I know
blarglefiend despises Slash with every fibre of his being that bothers remembering, and I deeply regret ever pushing Slash as a solution. Mind you, Zope was worse.
(Possibly with a new domain name owned by someone other than Ben Butler, who has been AWOL for a coupla years.)
(Note that the question is not "what CMS has a pretty skin and a whiz-bang interface" but "what CMS has a backend that's not shit and as a bonus could meaningfully use data from Slash?")
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 01:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 01:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 02:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 02:07 pm (UTC)I'm increasingly realising the truth of Brooks' assertion that the schema is all. "Show me your tables, and I won't usually need your flowchart; it'll be obvious." Jeremy Nixon is fiddling with home-rolled photo gallery software, and is starting with the schema — because if that's right, then the rest really is a SMOP: smart data structures allow simple code.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 02:14 pm (UTC)It's interesting seeing the different approaches that are emerging for web devel frameworks lately, with some taking the data as their lead... I quite like the concept, but it seems to be coupled with a lack of flexilibity in other areas so far.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-21 02:16 pm (UTC)