White china.
Oct. 2nd, 2006 10:46 pmThe Britannia Hotel, Nottingham are not just crap, they're credit card fraudsters. Do feel free to propagate the link.
Do not go to see The Science Of Sleep. Tell other people why they shouldn't go to see it either. (At least politicians aren't that stupid. Er.)
Perhaps if we start telling crap programmers that "undefined behaviour" includes "may choose to remove your balls", they'll behave? (No actual balls removed at that link, worse luck.) (courtesy
jdev)Scariest goddamn writer's guidelines ever. (courtesy
sola
cija)
I was talking about this with
hirez on Saturday over too much beer. He's just off to a science fiction writer's workshop where he gets a chance to guzzle the holy pee of the Nielsen-Haydens and Doctorow and such, assuming he can fight his way to the holy pee first.
Anyway. I know damn well ideas are bloody everywhere. Since I got a digital camera that doesn't suck, I've started seeing photos that must be taken everywhere I go. I've become sensitised to pics that are good ideas. Smoke and Mirrors by Gaiman, half the bloody stories are about writing and getting and using ideas. So the question is not "where do you get your ideas?" but "how do you recognise ideas?"
I'm still working on that one for Uncyclopedia. I usually work by juxtaposition. Someone will say something or two words will fall together in my head. "Linux Pride" — you just need to think those two words together and the article pretty much writes itself. John says he was surprised to realise that he writes stories with the same bits of his brain that write code. This means I should learn to write code like I write Wikipedia or Uncyclopedia articles.
Recognising ideas is like seeing the Ballardian nature of too many things. What software is analogous to Vermillion Sands? (qmail is, of course, Chronopolis.)
How do I spot a photo? How do I recognise when a juxtaposition is article material? Anyone else? What do you do to pin yours (photos, stories, pictures, dollies, songs, fart modulations) down into usable form?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 10:54 pm (UTC)Dinosaurs and sodomy?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 10:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:50 pm (UTC)Mind, I shall fetch you a sharp blow upon the nose should people go "Oh, you're piss-bloke's mate..." next week.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-04 08:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-04 08:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 10:56 pm (UTC)Remember the furore over the artist chappie who exhibited a pile of bricks? The dull and uninteresting would go "It's just a pile of bricks. I could have done that." But you didn't, which is one of the points.
One of the other points is that if that pile of bricks was an interesting art object, then so can any other assemblage of building materials, if looked at with the right eyes and mind. Up to and including Tyntesfield house or that splendid viaduct in France.
A good story comes from taking an odd idea and running with it. Like Izzard but different. I know I'm on to something when people start looking at me strangely and backing away because I've broken the pub-rule about only extracting a couple of jokes from a stupid comment. The best ideas just piss off under their own steam, all you can do is run to catch up and hope to be able to take notes at the jog.
And talking to the like-minded, obviously. Avoid those who say "But that's stupid" or "I don't understand it"
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:02 pm (UTC)"pub-rule about only extracting a couple of jokes from a stupid comment."
Oh, I do that all the time - taking a stupid comment and turning it into a routine on the spot is an art. My brand probably works better because I put in dick jokes and poo jokes.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 10:58 pm (UTC)(That's for the aesthetic sort of photography: light and shadows, reflections, interesting angles on architecture, and such. A lot of photography is more prosaic and utilitarian in its origins, being triggered by seeing something of note (like an amusing sign/ironic juxtaposition/piece of stencil art/whatever). Though even then, the sense helps with the composition. Having a camera that fits in a pocket is good; despite my A620's quality being greatly inferior to a good DSLR's (or even my old PowerShot G2's), resulting in heartbreakingly poor reproduction of, say, the last rays of a sunset reflected in a puddle, I have taken some of my best photos with it by sheer virtue of having it in my pocket at all times.
I haven't done much serious writing for years, though occasionally am inspired by recent events to wax Swiftean in my blog (http://dev.null.org/blog/) (which is mostly links-with-commentary). A recent example relates to US "goth" high-school shootings and "Islamic" terrorism (http://dev.null.org/blog/archive.cgi/2006/09/17#0008_gothophob).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:04 pm (UTC)I have carried cameras with me everywhere for years, but it's only with the Ixus 50 I've really started seeing photos everywhere. Because I know I have half a chance of capturing them. (The Casio Exilims are smaller, but (until recent models) completely shit cameras.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 04:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 04:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 04:32 pm (UTC)Really, the sensors are the same up and down the range. This is this season's 6MP sensor, this is this season's 7.1MP sensor, this is this season's 10MP sensor ... this has been the case since they switched from CYGM to RGBG, way back in the 2MP days. (The original Digital Ixus used a CYGM sensor, all other 2MP Ixuses used an RGBG sensor.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:16 pm (UTC)Why do I never get threats of ball crushing in the bug reports I see - maybe I need to get involved in bsd ;)
If women really were THAT controlled by our hormones we'd be useless. ffs.
How do I spot a photo? I just see it and it interests me. I see it as a frame, without me being there, divorced from its surroundings. It can be the shapes and colours, or the political/social content. Something just catches me and makes me think of contradictions, or insight, or hidden spaces.
This only applies to photos as photos - not snapshots. Photos are different - they are of themselves, not of reality. A snapshot is to show what someone/thing looks like. A photo for Wikipedia is deliberately of what something looks like from its normal angle. A photo for me (an art photo?) is the opposite - it's what things do actually look like but in a way that you don't notice.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-02 11:40 pm (UTC)I also only see them when I'm in a certain mental state.
I really don't know any more about it than that..
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 12:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 12:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 02:59 am (UTC)Another a four-letter long a.g. gal with a terminal alpha.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 07:01 am (UTC)My tuppence
Date: 2006-10-03 07:14 am (UTC)Don't neglect physical, repetitive action. Walking (without being unduly stressed about getting somewhere on time - so walking to and from the station only counts if you make a habit of being early rather than late!) and dancing and cleaning are all wonderful. It's a sort of dead time - you're doing something, but your brain can wander and make what associations it will.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 07:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 10:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 10:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 10:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 10:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 10:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 12:59 pm (UTC)Give me time. I'm sure I can find worse.
What do you do to pin yours (photos, stories, pictures, dollies, songs, fart modulations) down into usable form?
I don't know; it just happens. There's either a click or a flow. Sometimes if it's writing and it's complicated or long (like actual books), I make notes or outlines.
Also, the world is much too small. I don't know the Nielsen-Haydens, but I have been friends with one of their friends and employees for about a decade.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:59 pm (UTC)[FX: Rimshot]
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 04:15 pm (UTC)It's good that another writer uses it, though. Perhaps I should throw care to the wind and be happy with the phrase.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-03 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-24 01:26 am (UTC)Four weeks divided by 52 equals...
Date: 2006-10-04 12:34 am (UTC)Surely they should publish 13 times a year, not 12?