Getting off LiveJournal.
May. 31st, 2007 04:46 pmIn the latest SixApart fuckup, it turns out the complaint they scrambled to act upon was from a Christian Identity/Dominionist group — that is to say, backwoods rednecks where neo-Nazis inbreed with Klansmen. Fabulous choice of bedfellows! Be sure to bring this to prominent attention in discussions of this matter.
Shitty apology (comments already filled, sorry!). Questions on the CEO's CNet/CNN quote remain notably unanswered.
"Our decision here was not based on pure legal issues," countered Six Apart's Berkowitz. "It was based on what community we want to build and what we think is appropriate within that community and what's not. We have an awful broad range of discussions and topics and other things going on in LiveJournal, and we encourage other broad-ranging conversations on all sorts of topics. This was a specific case where we felt there was not a reason (for these journals to stay online)." Berkowitz said the company would "obviously apologize" to anyone whose journal was deleted in error but added: "That's going to be a very small minority of the sites. I would be shocked if it's more than a dozen."
Translation: "fuck off, you're almost all a bunch of paedophiles."
The number of journals is already going down. (Note that's a comment on the previous news post, bragging about the new high in journal numbers.)
My earlier posts on what to do if SixApart sends LiveJournal to shit seem somewhat more urgent. I personally have no plans to give SixApart my money ever again. Probably keep the account for now (or from January) as a freebie.
So: how are we going on maintaining the community aspect without putting all our eggs into another basket susceptible to this sort of gross stupidity? Networking public blogs is easy; the trick is how to friends-lock a blog post to be readable by third-party sites, in a manner usable by technophobes and yet not susceptible to phishing attacks. I invite suggestions from the exceedingly smart people reading this, and ask them to ask other exceedingly smart people they know.
Update: Considerably more than a dozen. Gosh! etc. I await evidence these people are not too stupid to give any more of my money. I wonder if I can do a chargeback.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 03:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 03:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 03:55 pm (UTC)Another option would be looking at the distributed KOM-system research, but only Canadians and Sweds know about KOM and I suspect it's too retro for this Web42.0 world.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 03:57 pm (UTC)OpenID.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 03:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 03:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:04 pm (UTC)Ideally someone we know will start up a similar service, and everyone can move to that ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-01 08:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:28 pm (UTC)Personally I don't think this is worth leaving over, but I think that was - just everybody didn't follow me, and the person I was following to Greatestjournal turned around and kicked me in the teeth, so I renewed my paid account here anyway.
I still have my DJ....
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:30 pm (UTC)Ahem. Let's try that one again. No commercial service yadda yadda is going to be immune to this problem because all commercial services are aggregates of individuals who may or may not make correct decisions or implement general policy decisions correctly. A decision to shut down a small number of pedo groups can easily be made worse by someone getting lazy and suspending by keyword rather than checking the accounts. This is not just a problem with LJ, it's a problem anywhere there are a sufficient number of people in a position where they can get lazy and damage things.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:29 pm (UTC)Guess I ought to take an XML dump of my more recent posts so my archive is up to date ...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 04:30 pm (UTC)[1] Yes, I do find that number quite astonishing
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 05:17 pm (UTC)You know what needs to happen to make this work? We already have the system: Usenet and NNTP. All it needs is a good, shiny Webloggy top layer. I'm going to keep ranting about it until some pinhead with the knowhow and time does it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 07:47 pm (UTC)Indeed. The real problem is the length of time it took for the apology to appear. I've been through similar situations where something drastic has to happen RIGHT NOW to fix a problem. There should have been a series of increasingly detailed posts in
"We have a problem with some journals violating TOS that we have to fix immediately because of X. Our first cut is likely to be drastic, but nothing will be deleted, just suspended. More information as we have it."
And so on. I've been in similar situations and been praised for my prompt action because I started with, "We have a serious problem here..." Not everyone's that clearheaded when the shit hits the fan though, even if it isn't the first time, just different shit. SixApart needs an emergency situations checklist to follow, or this *will* happen again.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 05:32 pm (UTC)Nah. It'll never work.
;)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 07:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 06:13 pm (UTC)It's called USENET.
If you want private to-the-community posting, encrypt the traffic to a key that gets passed to people if/when they evidence themselves as reasonable and prudent human beings, by whatever measure the group feels is reasonable. The thing is that you can never build community by having *everything* "friends-locked", so it's perfectly reasonable to layer security on top of an existing resource. So what you may be *really* looking for isn't a site or meida engine, but rather decent encryption with good group-key management.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 07:34 pm (UTC)Already figured out (well much less susceptible to phishing at any rate) and launching in October.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 08:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 09:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 09:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 10:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 11:14 pm (UTC)Also I don't have much desire to actively maintain my own weblog at the moment, let alone implementing a whole heap of new doohickeys of limited effectiveness just so I can let certain people read stuff and not other certain people.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-01 02:53 am (UTC)Once you've got a decent ID management system, though, the filtering & locking will be pretty much trivial.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-01 10:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-02 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-02 05:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: