Getting more free-content images.
Sep. 12th, 2007 02:49 pmDurova writes a nice piece for the marketers recruiting more free images. Nice one!
I'm wondering how to do this for entertainers. Bad live shots, snapshots and so forth under a free content licence always supersede something that isn't free content. (Many have argued the toss on this, but as things stand that's the way things are.) I'm wondering a useful way to reliably get entertainment industry promo photos to flock to us. I suspect our really crappy examples would be a start. e.g. "Top ten site, our rules. You don't get to have a good photo under your control. You get a crappy photo that's under a suitable license, or you give us a good photo under a suitable license. The latter is probably a lot more to your liking and that of your artists."
The hardest part is publishing that somewhere it would actually get read by the target audience. Ideas?
By the way: if you have decent photos you've taken of someone who's got a Wikipedia article but no good free content photo, we'd love 'em. CC by-sa and GFDL both require your name staying attached to the image details page.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 02:03 pm (UTC)Good luck with that. Your best bet is to draft a suitable email that you can send back to those that enquire. The "somewhere" is the really hard part.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 02:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 02:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 02:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 04:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 09:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-12 09:51 pm (UTC)This picture is shit. You can help by replacing it with a free picture that is not shit.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-13 01:46 pm (UTC)Actually, maybe I wasn't that far off.