Built like an angel, six feet tall.
Jun. 16th, 2008 11:22 pmWANT!
Literary criticism is snake oil because it's alchemy chasing its tail. It needs to develop into chemistry.
Thursday we had a visit from
a_carnal_mink and
kits_the_dm, on their world tour. Dom and
arkady had an animated discussion of the skills learnt as trained killers and killer trainers. (Is it wrong to sort of hope for a breakin so you can set your girlfriend on them?)
For Father's Day, I got cake! A ginger cake and a very sugary vanilla "coffee" cake.
secretlondon came over to test data transfer efficiency between 500GB USB hard disks.
I have found my MP3 player after Freda lost it, being the miniature evil genius she is. I am most pleased to discover that it plays Oggs (despite this not being mentioned in the manual or on the box — if I want to hack firmware I could get it playing AAC as well) and I also successfully repaired said unrepairable throwaway device when the headphone socket broke away from the circuit board. Fixing the disposable is just the thing for that warm hacky glow.
I am very pleased with the new Rocknerd. I'm managing a story a day so far, though CONTRIBUTIONS ARE MOST WELCOME. The category icons and submitting stories now work as well. All I need now is how to make the header display the logo instead of the WordPress Kubrick theme default. (And damn getting stuff out of Slash is gonna be evil.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:10 pm (UTC)Good literary criticism doesn't provide clear answers - it provides interesting and useful confusions - things that require more thought and complexity.
As for alchemy, yes, alchemy got it right when it became chemistry and embraced falsifiability. But it also hit its stride when it became chaos magic and threw away the idea of measurable effects on the real world. Both approaches work.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-17 07:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:32 pm (UTC)You can un-Kubrick the look by messing around with the style sheet a bit.
It's all piss-easy!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-16 11:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-17 12:19 am (UTC)And at least get the last few remaining believers in Freudian psychoanalysis run out of the field with horsewhips, should any remain.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-17 01:18 am (UTC)silverchair is again ruining australian music
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-17 07:18 am (UTC)That article seems to be suggesting switching to bean-counting instead. Statistical analysis and stylometry aren't bad tools, but they're not the sort of thing that should drive criticism.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-17 10:43 am (UTC)That was... not entirely nice. Not entirely nice, at all, in fact. At least I only needed to faff around with the SQL data and play mix-and-match with the data.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-06-18 09:27 pm (UTC)