We are the robots.
May. 4th, 2009 11:56 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Don't use the Firefox NoScript extension — the developer has gone corrupt. Not a good thing in security software.
Good Lord (courtesy
themadcatlady)
Rocknerd: Dancing about architecture! What is it good for?; Artist's shit.
NotN: lots. Go click. Tell your friends.
This week has involved an anniversary dinner with arkady on Tuesday, getting smashed at the Dev with
ashbet on Wednesday and manflu on the weekend, which led to blowing an appointment for
aster13 to therapeutically beat the crap out of me. Bah. My parents are arriving in the UK tonight, going straight to the hotel and visiting our hovel tomorrow to meet their second grandchild for the first time.
Arkady is having tremendous fun with pndc's horrible old boat anchor, having set up a microphone to record herself and the girls singing over YouTube instrumentals. Freda also stands up and sings and dances at the microphone like the natural rock star she is.
Manflu does mean a few days with redcountess, which is nice in between being ill.
An md5sum hash of every file on a 500GB USB1.1 disk on a 233MHz Pentium I MMX takes about two days. In case you were wondering.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-04 11:29 pm (UTC)Either way, I never had a problem with ads or non-working of either extension!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-04 11:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-04 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-04 11:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 01:26 am (UTC)Are there any NoScript alternatives? I don't seem to have found any so far.
Because I've been browsing the net with FF on my Windows Machine without any plug-ins, and lordy, is The Net ugly.
Of course, all of this explained why NoScript likes to update so regularly, and always opened up the NS webpage.
Now, if I could get get CustomizeGoogle to start blocking Text Ads I'd be happy.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 04:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 08:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 02:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 03:04 pm (UTC)I mean, if there's a problem I'll whine about it. And whines on this issue are snall.
Adbock works well, Filterset.G is ideal.
If you have issues, it's probably local.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 03:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 03:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 09:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 09:27 am (UTC)Short version: He prostrates himself on the altar of public opinion for being caught, and has fixed it.
For the moment we can go on with our lives until the next Internet drama.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 10:42 am (UTC)Worry about it later.
The Internerds will let you know in the meantime if a viable alternative arises and you need to do anything.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 10:38 am (UTC)This incident was bad enough that mozilla.org has changed the rules for addons - "no, you're really not allowed to fuck with other addons."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 10:40 am (UTC)I'm happy enough to continue to use NS (because it's better than nothing), but I do expect this to be the beginning of the end for it.
Amazingly, I expected that would have been a rule. I must be hopelessly idealistic.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 12:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-04 11:30 pm (UTC)There was a Slashdot thread about it in the last few days.
/I'd find it, but I've been Firefox'd.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-04 11:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 12:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 12:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 07:28 am (UTC)Shaeleigh likes to bop along to Fatboy Slim already, perhaps because this one (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAvpSdfYAlI") has hand puppets in it.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 07:49 am (UTC)It is almost worth building that capability into the drive itself...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 10:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 10:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 10:37 am (UTC)It's sooooooooooooooper-nice in many ways. Of course, at work we tickled an obscure but crippling bug which we're about to put in a hotfix for and which *should* be fixed in the next Solaris 10 release ...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 11:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-05-05 11:29 am (UTC)