And all we get are forty hack reporters.
Jun. 18th, 2005 01:08 pmWikipedia basically works. Wikinews is producing interesting results and some good original reporting. Now the LA Times is running an experiment in wikified opinion pieces: they put up their June 17th editorial on a MediaWiki installation as what they call a Wikitorial. (They're also trying to turn "wiki" into a verb: an action taken upon a source text.)
The result is interesting: a considerably more polemical opinion piece with surprisingly good factual support (and only one Godwination). And of course a counterpoint was promptly split off (by Jimbo, no less).
Wikinews operates strictly to the Wikipedia Neutral Point Of View policy, and people couldn't really see editorial opinion working on a wiki. But so far the good wackos seem to be outnumbering the bad wackos.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-18 12:18 pm (UTC)(have you heard their latest idea, "Wikinews Network"? i'm sure it's revolutionising media and whatever, but y'know, Wikimedia?)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-18 12:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-18 12:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-18 12:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-18 03:35 pm (UTC)Why is this article named "Dreams of War and Retribution" where the original editoria was "War and Consequences"? I couldn't find any trace of the original in any history on the Wiki...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-06-18 03:44 pm (UTC)