Charlie's prison audit.
Sep. 18th, 2007 11:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Being a pack of twunts, SixApart think this is a fabulous idea. To opt the hell out, log in to all of your accounts in turn, go to the admin console, enter the text set opt_exclude_stats 1 and press "execute." And spread the word.
I mean, they could just have used this.
How to make £5 steak taste like £50 steak.
bmovie was the night out I needed. I LOVE YOU ALL. Lotsa pics to go up when I get 'em done. I'm sorta busy.
Work is GODDAMN INSANE. One guy's last day was on Friday (and I'm sure HR will approve the job description, which hasn't changed in the year since I was hired, before the end of time) and one is on holiday, so there's three and a bit of us in the office dealing with mountains of crap. Today's special joy: installing a new version of something from a source RPM on a dev playpen box with three previous versions in various states of repair installed from source. Break out the big spanner and the dodgy library symlinks! And $PATH had /usr/local/bin before /usr/bin, and the same for libs. (You are not expected to understand this. The tone should be clear.)
Freda is fractious, with teething and growing pains, so the girls are exhausted dealing with her all day and I get home and exercise my l33t Daddy p0w3rz of cooking and dandling. Yeah, I'm loving it.
I have failed to beg off Saturday's on-call. BOTHER. So I will be at home, arkady and Freda will be at a one-year-old's birthday party and
redcountess and
mirrorshard aim to rep-ra-zent tha cru at Polyday. I welcome visitors next week, day or evening.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 10:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:02 pm (UTC)£10 for waged people and £5 for unwaged. There are no advance bookings; simply turn up and pay on the day.
*vom*
usually i have to at least get past the first screen before a poly thing makes me feel ashamed to be associated.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 05:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 09:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 09:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 06:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 06:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 09:28 am (UTC)I'm employed, I have no objection to paying more than someone who's not employed... my disposable income is probably 2 orders of magnitude greater than theirs.
Recalling the state of my finances when I was unemployed, that price differential would probably have made the difference between me being able to go or not, and I'd have been very grateful for that. Was, with regard to other events with similar policies.
I really don't see the problem. Unless you're assuming 'cut off my nose' levels of pride on the part of the unemployed.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 09:48 am (UTC)I'm not going and I'm lucky to get a slightly higher level of benefit (as I'm on incapacity) but discounts do affect whether you can attend or not.
I suspect the original poster thought it was rewarding the unemployed for being "dole layabouts" or something..
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 06:00 pm (UTC)i DO object to subsidising them. i ALREADY voluntarily subsidise quite a few less-monied friends by paying their share at fairly priced events. and i already subsidise those on benefits with my taxes. i object to any form of double taxation.
i also disagree with the assumption that anyone in employment has a greater disposable income than anyone not in employment. that is manifestly untrue, especially in London.
i additionally find it vaguely insulting that by having the policy, the event implies that a) being poly means you're likely to agree with it, and b) being poly means you're likely to be unemployed.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 11:57 pm (UTC)Also, it's not necessarily as simple as paying for other people. I imagine the variable costs for this event are fairly small, and it's mainly fixed costs (the venue, etc). In which case, you're not paying for that person to come along, rather you're all paying towards the fixed costs. Consider that the price that maximises the amount of revenue from employed people will be higher than the price that maximises revenue from unemployed people (since the latter are less willing or able to pay a higher amount). Therefore having a single "average" price would mean the revenue would lower, so to compensate the price would have to be greater than whatever the average price is. In an extreme case (if most unemployed people couldn't afford more than 5 pounds), you could end up with the single price figure being above 10 pounds due to the lower numbers.
So rather than looking at it that you're paying for other people, look at it that this means they can get a load of revenue off of unemployed people who otherwise might not have been able to come.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-20 07:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-20 10:15 am (UTC)In that case I shall be curious as to why it's a bad thing, even if there are economic reasons for doing it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-20 07:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-20 11:44 pm (UTC)Concessions for 'the Unwaged' may overlap conveniently with those for students, home-makers, the retired, the disabled, and might even save ink, but they are not the same - basic set theory. How does one prove that one is unwaged? For twenty seven quid I told a stranger I ejaculate Haagen Daz. Hell, to save $1 CANADIAN I claimed to be a student when in fact I was not, and that's a closer match. For £5? I mean, if I'm out and proud about subverting the dominant paradigm of monogamy, why should I sweat stretching the truth regarding my financial status as a student who is also in employment, say?
£7.50, however, is a bad price. In fairness, one should calculate the proportion that the unwaged are likely to represent (which is unlikely to be 50%, even amongst your subscribers), and adjust the price accordingly. Then ignore it, bump tix to £8.30, and trust in folks' assumption that an obscure price reflects a meticulously calculated costing.
I suspect the scrupulous honesty inherent in the community has blinded them to the potential for missed revenue they have exposed themselves to.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:34 pm (UTC)apt-get install clue failed
unmountable wetware volume
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:39 pm (UTC)rpm -i clue
rpm -i --force clue
rpm -i --force --force --FORCE clue
rm -rf /
Dev playpens are expected to be like this (as I said to the dev when he apologised for the state of the place). Staging and live are allegedly better
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 03:17 am (UTC):P
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:47 pm (UTC)Sixapart is employing the breakage strategy - apparently theyve been studying how rebates "work".
I'm literally doing this right now. Two less than ideal cuts are laying in salt and spice on the kitchen counter.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 12:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 01:09 am (UTC)Here in the states, at least, mail in rebate forms are made as convoluted as possible and processed against strict guidelines in order to facilitate the highest per centage of breakage - improperly filled out forms, etc - as possible, thereby minimizing the amount of rebate monies that actually get paid out.
It's great for profits. Make it difficult to do something, even when it will cost the consumer more money and the lazy consumer will skip it in order to see whats on television.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 03:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 12:53 am (UTC)I have a slice in the fridge defrosting.
I'll probably have to use sea salt, so hopefully there isn't a difference between table and sea salt that I can't overcome.
Do let me know how it goes.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 12:56 am (UTC)Sea salt is what you wanna use.
I just finished eating and goddamn. GOOD EATS. I'll post a full write up in a few minutes on my lj.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 01:01 am (UTC)*prints out website*
*dies a little seeing garlic truffle fries*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-18 11:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 12:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 12:48 am (UTC)At what time do you usually serve the l33t cooked meals?
I usually shoot for arriving about 5 minutes before dinner is served.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 03:09 am (UTC)Wow. Someone rediscovered the dry rub. What's next? Is he going to invent aged beef?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 03:43 am (UTC)On that note, I think I need to go subscribe a few more penis-photo comms... oh, but they say they won't instrument private posts. Bah. Surely I can find *some*thing.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 08:29 am (UTC)export PATH
Quiche eaters.... !!!!!!!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 09:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 09:50 am (UTC)There is no such command 'opt_exclude_stats'.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 10:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 10:58 am (UTC)User property 'opt_exclude_stats' set to '1' for secretlondon
Yay!
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 06:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-19 07:46 pm (UTC)set opt_exclude_stats 1
then hit the button.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 12:02 am (UTC)